--On Monday, August 09, 2010 17:40 -0700 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8/9/2010 5:36 PM, Tony Hansen wrote: >> On the flip side is this: >> >> 4.5.3.2.6. DATA Termination: 10 Minutes. > > I can understand thinking that this is a 'flip' side, but as I > recall, there was different intent that drove the two-three > rules. > > The core problem with doing any serious processing after > crlf.crlf is that it can take an unbounded amount of time, > plus Internet delays can get interesting. All of which can > run things up to the timeout when that's not intended. > > A big timeout is not meant to mean that one can take lots of > time... That is certainly how I've always understood it. john
- Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Steve Atkins
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Tony Hansen
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Dave CROCKER
- Re: Processing after the end of DA... John C Klensin
- Re: Processing after the end of DA... Tony Hansen
- Re: Processing after the end o... Hector Santos
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end of DA... Hector Santos
- Re: Processing after the end of DA... ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Processing after the end o... ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: Processing after the end o... Hector Santos
- Re: Processing after the e... Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the e... Carl S. Gutekunst
- Re: Processing after the end o... SM
