On 18 Oct 2010, at 17:53, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > It looks to me like there’s an ABNF citation issue in RFC5321. Section > 4.1.2’s ABNF makes reference to “atext” but it’s not defined anywhere. It is > defined in RFC5322 though.
Agreed, I have reported this here already as well. I'm afraid it slipped when I was doing the final review. "String" is also declared but never used in any of the syntax. > I don’t see this covered in any RFC5321 errata. Shall I open one? I should. The omission can be put down to an editorial nit. Cheers, Sabahattin
