Donald E. Eastlake 3rd: > The primary concern in the IETF is producing good protocols. I believe that the IETF model -- for better or for worse -- is a good thing for developing countries, compared to a membership organization like ISOC. Having said, it does not mean that organizational improvement should be banned. P.S. the aging board and steering group members reminds me to the late stagnated Soviet Union empire... :^). regards, -- - Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim -- VLSM-TJT -- http://rms46.vlsm.org/ - - DOTCOM... coma coma banana fana coma dotcom... -- the DNS game --
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meeting... John Stracke
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings fo... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for AP... Graham Klyne
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings fo... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meeting... Thomas Narten
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Anders Feder
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Anders Feder
- RE: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Ian King
- RE: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for AP... Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings fo... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for AP... Dave Crocker
- RE: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WG... Stewart Nolan