In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maha
devan Iyer typed:
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Everybody,
>>>
>>> Would it not be nice to have some sort of quality control task force that
>>> assigns a quality level for the web sites through out the world.
>>>
>>> This would make the site developers to bring in the higher quality to the
>>> net.
>>> This could be used as an additional criteria in the search engines.
>>> This could make higher quality sites to be a revenue generator.
>>>
>>>
>>> With more and more web sites, we r getting lost in finding quality
>>> information.
>>
>>
>>
>>What quality of a web site are you referring to?
>>Quality of service or Quality of Content? The latter is subjective.
so is the former.
see
G. M. Wilson and M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): Investigating the Impact
of Audio Degradations on Users: Subjective vs. Objective
Assessment Methods. To be presented as a full paper at OZCHI'2000,
Sydney, Dec. 2000.
A. Watson & M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): The Good, the Bad, and the
Muffled: The Impact of Different Degradations on Internet
Speech. To be presented as a full paper at ACM Multimedia, Los
Angeles, Oct. 30- Nov. 3.
G. Wilson & M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): Do Users Always Know What's
Good For Them? Utilising Physiological Responses to
Assess Media Quality. To be presented as a full paper at HCI 2000,
September 5th - 8th, Sunderland, UK. Proceedings published
by Springer.
A. Bouch, M. A. Sasse & H. DeMeer (2000): Of Packets and People: A
User-Centred Approach to Quality of Service. Proceedings
of IWQoS 2000, Pittsburgh, PA, June 5-8, pp. 189-197.
A. Bouch and M. A. Sasse (2000): The case for predictable media
quality in networked multimedia applications. Proceedings of the
ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN'00), 25-27th
January 2000, San Jose, USA.
etc etc etc
cheers
jon
