In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] t
yped:
>>Quality of Service or Content??
>>Easy answer:Quality of Service.
well, the first thing you need before quality of service is
e-quality of service (TM)
i.e. you need a definition of fairness (max min, or proportional)
then you need _quantity of service_
then you can apply the work below to map from subjective requirements
to objective ones, and still deal with the financial aspects in a
transparent manner...(as well as doing some fancy marketing)
there was aVERY good tutorial on this at SIGCOMM this year...
>>Quality of Content should be left to 'the Law of Natural Selection' and the First
>Amendment Rights of the US Constitution (Freedom of Speech), which is the least
>expensive and the long term good solution.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 06 September 2000, Jon Crowcroft wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maha
>>> devan Iyer typed:
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hello Everybody,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Would it not be nice to have some sort of quality control task force that
>>> >>> assigns a quality level for the web sites through out the world.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This would make the site developers to bring in the higher quality to the
>>> >>> net.
>>> >>> This could be used as an additional criteria in the search engines.
>>> >>> This could make higher quality sites to be a revenue generator.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> With more and more web sites, we r getting lost in finding quality
>>> >>> information.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>What quality of a web site are you referring to?
>>> >>Quality of service or Quality of Content? The latter is subjective.
>>>
>>> so is the former.
>>>
>>> see
>>> G. M. Wilson and M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): Investigating the Impact
>>> of Audio Degradations on Users: Subjective vs. Objective
>>> Assessment Methods. To be presented as a full paper at OZCHI'2000,
>>> Sydney, Dec. 2000.
>>>
>>> A. Watson & M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): The Good, the Bad, and the
>>> Muffled: The Impact of Different Degradations on Internet
>>> Speech. To be presented as a full paper at ACM Multimedia, Los
>>> Angeles, Oct. 30- Nov. 3.
>>>
>>> G. Wilson & M. A. Sasse (forthcoming): Do Users Always Know What's
>>> Good For Them? Utilising Physiological Responses to
>>> Assess Media Quality. To be presented as a full paper at HCI 2000,
>>> September 5th - 8th, Sunderland, UK. Proceedings published
>>> by Springer.
>>>
>>> A. Bouch, M. A. Sasse & H. DeMeer (2000): Of Packets and People: A
>>> User-Centred Approach to Quality of Service. Proceedings
>>> of IWQoS 2000, Pittsburgh, PA, June 5-8, pp. 189-197.
>>>
>>> A. Bouch and M. A. Sasse (2000): The case for predictable media
>>> quality in networked multimedia applications. Proceedings of the
>>> ACM/SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN'00), 25-27th
>>> January 2000, San Jose, USA.
>>>
>>> etc etc etc
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> jon
>>
>>
cheers
jon
