As someone who has cited I-Ds in published papers (if you're curious, see http://www.research.att.com/~smb/papers/badesp.ps -- I even identified one of the I-Ds as an "obsolete Internet draft), I have to support the notion of keeping them around. In my case, I wanted to point out the inherent problems in a particular approach to IPsec. I also needed to point out the evolution of the ideas over time. I know of no better way to do that than to refer to successive versions of the same document. In fact, I had to hunt through the net to find various versions of the documents in question... --Steve Bellovin
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Randy Bush
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Greg Minshall
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bill Manning
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Scott Bradner
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Keith Moore
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Jeffrey Mogul
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Joe Touch
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Salo
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Steve Conner
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Scott Bradner
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Dave Crocker