> How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space? because in a NATted network the same addresses are used in different parts of the network. addresses are meaningless.
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! David W. Morris
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Masataka Ohta
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! M Dev
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Holdrege
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Brim
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! chris d koeberle
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Melinda Shore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore