Folks should read and *refer* to the NAT WG documents before commenting. An awful lot of work was put into the content and wording of these documents. RFC 2663 draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-06.txt & RFC 2993
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! David W. Morris
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Masataka Ohta
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! M Dev
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Holdrege
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Brim
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! chris d koeberle
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Melinda Shore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Robinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter