| It's already happening. Try running IPSec from one 10 network to another 10 | network. Much pain. Surely the "much pain" is because, as Melinda Shore indicates, some "anti-NAT fanatics" cannot understand the distinction between "who" and "where"? NAT merely exposes and exacerbates the perceptual problem, leading to bruised knees. Sean.
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Stephen Sprunk
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Iliff, Tina
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Pan Jung
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Iliff, Tina
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! David Higginbotham
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Chris Millikin
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Chris Millikin
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! David Higginbotham
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Chris Millikin
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kevin Farley
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Bradner
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Paul Ferguson