RE: NATs *ARE* evil!

[David Higginbotham]

RFC 2993 Architectural Implications of NAT's ?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 12:55 PM
To: Dave Robinson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NATs *ARE* evil! 


On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:11:29 EST, Dave Robinson said:
> What's the problem with locally significant addresses?  Having
thousands of

Hmm.. this from a guy posting from endtoend.com?  I'm not sure if the
right word is "ironic" or "sarcastic".  In any case, didn't we just
release an RFC detailing in excruciating detail?
-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech