Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd read that RIPE is at least making micro-allocations available. The > ability to get a few /27 allocations can REALLY help in cross-connecting > corporations which find themselves needing private interconnects. It can help, but it is hardly sufficient. There are hundreds of servers involved in some of the systems I've seen. Thirty addresses won't usually cut it. In the end, we need more address space, and that means v6. -- Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Quality NetBSD CDs, Support & Service. http://www.wasabisystems.com/
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! RJ Atkinson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Daniel Senie
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Sean Doran
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kevin Farley
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Tony Dal Santo
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeffrey Altman
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Geoff Huston
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Geoff Huston
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Crawford
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Randy Bush