Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

[Matt Crawford]

>     > What is technically wrong with v6 that isn't already technically wrong
>     > with v4? 
> 
> Thank you, Perry, you've put it in a nutshell.
>       Noel

Excellent.  We've agreed that IPv6's problems are a subset of IPv4's.

Now until we have a concrete design proposal for a perfect world, can
we drop that particular line of taunting?