Ed Gerck wrote: > > Keith Moore wrote: > > > I expressed an opinion that this group should confine itself to addressing > > short-term goals rather than trying to make NATs a part of the Internet > > architecture. > > NATs are already part of the Internet, and gaining share. An alternate perspective is that the Internet continues to (mostly) work despite the presence of NATs. It is a paradox to begin one standard by selectively omitting current standards (e.g., RFC1122). Joe
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Jon Crowcroft
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- First bit of IP Addresses Joe Touch
- First bit of IP Addresses Anshul Jain
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Sean Doran
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Christian Huitema
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Bill Manning
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Bill Manning
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Keith Moore
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables Fleischman, Eric W