> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 3:37 AM > To: Doug Sauder > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: HTML better for small PDAs > > > 1) Was your millenia-old data *written in XML*, or was it *converted to* > XML > within the past 5 years? > > > This is not a valid argument. Egyptian Hieroglyphs were not written in ASCII either !
- HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Doug Sauder
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Christian Huitema
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Christian Huitema
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Richardson