% >Actually, the engineering cost of building IPv6 into operating systems % >is already essentially paid. The cost of building it into routers and the % >like % >is paid. The vendors are all (basically) IPv6-ready. % % Valdis, % % Your message is generally well put. However, while it is possible to send % the packets on the wire, the fundamental underlying scaling point, the % routing system, has not been properly addressed. Perhaps a solution can be % retrofitted in, but then again, who knows? This, I thought, was <largely> % the point of multi6. % % Eliot
Hum... I thought that multi6 was trying to figure out the ramifications of multihomeing w/ IPv6. The issues wrt the routing system really need to occur in a WG devoted to better routing protocols, not one with a focus on multihoming. at least IMHO... -- --bill