Completely fantasimal -----Original Message----- From: Da Silva, Pedro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Why IPv6 is a must?
That depends on what you mean by 'realistic' -----Original Message----- From: Steve Deering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why IPv6 is a must? At 8:36 AM -0500 11/29/01, Eric Rosen wrote: >Sure, in theory one could add zillions of new globally routable addresses >without increasing the size of the routing tables in the default-free zone >at all. > >The skepticism is about whether there is (or even could be) a realistic plan >to make this happen. What's the realistic plan to prevent the IPv4 routing table from growing to 2^32 route entries? Steve