Re: What is at stake?

[Ed Gerck]

Keith Moore wrote:

> > There have now been multiple postings that explained how reality was
> > substantially different than you have been claiming.
> >
> > As a consequence, actual history does not support your conclusion.
> >
> > In other words, Ed, the Internet does not have the problem that you are so
> > tenaciously promoting.
>
> no, it doesn't follow.  it follows only that Ed has failed to demonstrate
> the problem.

And so that we might all agree, what would that problem be?

Cheers,

Ed Gerck