John Stracke wrote:
> And the authors do caution that their numbers are blind to the quality of 
> the RFCs.  Their point, though, is that looking at the easy metrics is 
> better than not measuring anything at all;

Wrong information is worse than no information. If the results don't 
mean anything, why measure?

Lars
-- 
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>               Information Sciences Institute
http://www.isi.edu/larse/              University of Southern California

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to