Steve> I can't get upset about Microsoft declining to ship poorly-tested Steve> code. Given how many security holes are due to buggy, poorly-tested Steve> programs, I applaud anyone who takes that seriously.
Well, suppose they were to ship IPv6 without IPsec, on the grounds that they didn't have the testing resources for IPsec. Would you still be applauding them? Or would you be questioning whether they have their priorities right? Features always fall off due to the inability to allocate sufficient testing resources, but a vendor does have some choice over which features those are.
