On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 03:39 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
I think it would be more accurate to say that a NAT contravenes the basic Internet prnciple of universal connectivity.
expecting the network to isolate insecure hosts from untrustworthy attackers, or more generally, to enforce policy about what kinds of content are permitted to pass, has always been a stretch.
So where do firewalls fit into your picture? Do they represent for the network or for the hosts?
simon
-- www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel
