For those who wish to become involved in the policy process or view the
archives:
http://www.apnic.net/community/lists/index.html
http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html
http://lacnic.net/en/discussion_boards.html
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/about/maillists.html
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ray Plzak
> Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: accusations of cluelessness
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Keith Moore
> > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 1:25 AM
> > To: Scott Bradner
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: accusations of cluelessness
> >
> >
> > > Just what would you suggest in the way of relaxing?
> >
> > since I view this as a hypothetical situation anyway (and one
> > that isn't
> > likely to happen in the real world) I don't think it's
> > necessary to pin down
> > exactly how they'd go about relaxing the criteria - only to
> > realize that it is
> > possible to relax those criteria
>
> There are currently several discussions in the ARIN region regarding
> IPv4 allocations both in regard to minimum size and criteria.
> Discussions about IPv4 policy and IPv6 policy are of a
> contiuous nature
> in all of the RIRs reflecting changes in the operational community.
>
> Ray
>
>
