Subject lines for emails should be required to have only words that can be found in the dictionary. This eliminates any spam like [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ or m0rtgage.
The real problem isn't from companies who send bulk email and allow you to opt out. The problem comes from people that are trying not to let you opt out. Not only don't they let you opt out, but they also try to get around your filters. Original Message: >From: Dave Aronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dean Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: proposal for built-in spam burden & email privacy protection >Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:50:00 -0500 >On Mon February 9 2004 18:57, Dean Anderson wrote: > > > The IEMMC was formed in May of 1997 between Cyberpromotions and AGIS > > and some others. Its goal was to encourage voluntary spam labeling > > and opt-out lists, and to work out a compromise on spam between the > > advertising and technical community. > >...which must necessarily consist of something MUCH better than labeling >and opt-out, but that was pretty much their limit. Opt-out is a >non-starter, so to speak. It was pretty clear to me that the IEMMC was >basically a PR ploy, to delay any real action. IMNSHO, AGIS had no >intention whatsoever of disconnecting, reining in, imposing conditions >on, or in any other way not being a haven for spammers, so long as >being a spamhaven was profitable. > > > One might say this is ancient history, but in fact, the IEMMC > > position on spam was practically legislated in the CAN-SPAM act, > >Yup. Which means not that SPAM is in the CAN, but that spammers CAN >SPAM. They just have to do a few things that the anti-spammers have >recognized as useless (if not worse) for well over ten years. > >Long story short, CAN-SPAM is trying to pull the same wool over the >public's eyes, that the IEMMC was trying to pull over the anti-spam >community's. Unfortunately, John Q. Public can't tell the fine worsted >wool it's being sold as, from the cheap polyester it really is.... > >Disclaimer: this doesn't mean that hacking Cyberpromo was "right"! I'm >not one of your "radical abusers".... > >-- >Dave Aronson, Senior Software Engineer, Secure Software Inc. >Email me at: work (D0T) 2004 (@T) dja (D0T) mailme (D0T) org >(Opinions above NOT those of securesw.com unless so stated!) >WE'RE HIRING developers, auditors, and VP of Prof. Services. > > > >
