looks good to me - one suggestion of clearer language and a potential addition
o Documents for which special rules exist, including IAB documents and April 1st RFCs, and republication of documents from other SDOs - the IESG and the RFC Editor keep a running dialogue on which documents these are
awkward wording - maybe you want to say
o The IESG and the RFC Editor keep a running dialogue on which documents require special rules (for example, IAB documents, April 1st RFCs, and republication of documents from other SDOs)
Scott, while I agree that the current language is not optimal, I don't think the above is the right fix. The whole point of the agreements about publication of IAB documents is that the RFC Editor reports, from an overall policy and strategy standpoint, with the IAB. Turning that situation into "the IESG and the RFC Editor keep a running dialogue" rather dramatically revises (or confuses) that situation.
john
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
