thanks for your comments, Pekka!
wrt review subjects - we went a few rounds on this, and the current list is probably a reasonable compromise between "no list" and "exhaustive list" - it's short enough to make people notice that "such as" probably covers a lot of stuff not mentioned. Good that you can live with this one!
--On 19. mai 2004 15:12 +0300 Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RFC 3710 [3] section 5.2.2 describes the spring 2003 review process;
==> was that really spring 2003? The RFC was published in 2004.
:-(
even though it was informational only, it did take a year to get from the first draft to the published RFC.... and we chose not to make it claim to track changes to the process that occured over that time....
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
