Brian sez: > I've gone various ways on this, but I think that imposing a duty of > regular payment on ISOC is appropriate - so that paying the IETF > late doesn't become a tempting cash-flow management tool. I would > be happy with a phrasing that asks for at least 3 payments per > year.
I agree about imposing a duty for regular payments - and if it has to be made more specific then "at least 3 times per year" is the least bad way to do so Scott _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
