On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:16, ext Scott W Brim wrote: > On 1/7/2005 10:56, Harald Tveit Alvestrand allegedly wrote: > > > I think this line of thought has died down without any great > > disagreement.... the consensus seems to be that the following sentence: > > > > The IAOC members shall not receive any compensation (apart from > > exceptional reimbursement of expenses) for their services as > > members of the IAOC. > > > > belongs in the document. I think that placing it at the end of 4.0 > > makes for the most reasonable placement (together with all the stuff > > about membership selection). > > > > (Personally, I'm not fond of the word "exceptional". It begs the > > question of who grants exceptions, and what the criteria for > > exceptions are. But the debaters seem to favour it. > > I'd rather say "possible", and add "IAOC sets and publishes rules for > > reimbursement of expenses, if that ever becomes necessary". But I can > > live with the current text). > > > I find "possible" to be more prone to confusion than "exceptional", but > I like the idea of adding your extra sentence even with "exceptional".
WFM > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
