On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:16, ext Scott W Brim wrote:
> On 1/7/2005 10:56, Harald Tveit Alvestrand allegedly wrote:
> 
> > I think this line of thought has died down without any great 
> > disagreement.... the consensus seems to be that the following sentence:
> >
> >  The IAOC members shall not receive any compensation (apart from
> >  exceptional reimbursement of expenses) for their services as
> >  members of the IAOC.
> >
> > belongs in the document. I think that placing it at the end of 4.0 
> > makes for the most reasonable placement (together with all the stuff 
> > about membership selection).
> >
> > (Personally, I'm not fond of the word "exceptional". It begs the 
> > question of who grants exceptions, and what the criteria for 
> > exceptions are. But the debaters seem to favour it.
> > I'd rather say "possible", and add "IAOC sets and publishes rules for 
> > reimbursement of expenses, if that ever becomes necessary". But I can 
> > live with the current text).
> >
> I find "possible" to be more prone to confusion than "exceptional", but 
> I like the idea of adding your extra sentence even with "exceptional".

WFM

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-- 
Jonne Soininen
Nokia

Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to