On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, John C Klensin wrote: > "...believed to violate..." > "...putatively violates..." > "...alleged to violate..." > > and other phrases would, I think, satisfy both Scott's concerns > and yours.
Sure, I'm good with that. How about: "...an explanation of how the decision or action is thought to violate the BCPs..." > These are the sort of language/presentation details that I wish > we could assume that final editing would straighten out. It is > not a good sign that we think we need to fix them on the IETF > list. Oops, I thought that had been done, and we were looking a final drafts. > john > > > -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000 _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
