> It's been pointed out that the note to DoC was actually sent by
> the IAB and the IETF *Chair* not the IETF as whole.
> 
> Obviously, the timescale of this RFI was too short for the
> IETF as a whole to debate a response. In fact, it was even too short
> for us to spot this nit.

Or to run a spell checker?  It would have been better to not answer
instead of doing such a haphazard job.  This was not an effective
document either in terms of process or substance.

Carl

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to