Julian Reschke wrote: > Joe Touch schrieb: >> ... >> As long as future versions are backward compatible with all past >> versions, that's fine. That has not been my impression of xml2rfc over >> the small window I tried to use it. >> ... > > I guess that depends on the expectation. RFC2629 defines semantical > markup. If your expectation is that a given input document will produce > *identical* ASCII output over time, then yes, you may experience > incompatibilities.
That's a problem when it changes page numbers (which end up being as useful as semantic tags) or figures. Or (as importantly) template or boilerplate text. Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
