Cool  Rob - how about we ask ALL of the other members of all of the other
WG's since these rules and processes effect them.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "todd glassey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <ietf@ietf.org>; "Noel Chiappa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than
some


> Todd,
>
> As one of the randoms (and speaking for nobody but myself)...
>
> > The facts remain - most IETF WG participants have no idea what is going
on
> > here - and that is not their fault - its the fault of the design of the
IETF
>
> Personally I've no huge problem with the nomcom.
>
> However, if you feel it needs to change, then the usual method would
> be to write two drafts.  The first a problem statement describing the
> issues with the current system, and the second a proposal of how to
> change it.  That way there is something concrete to discuss.

I wrote a draft about Open and Fair and was shot down for it. What I am
saying is that anything that threatens the ruling class of the IETF is just
that a threat to the ruling class. It is that Class of specialists who
refuse to be accountable for their actions that need to be addressed.

>
> If people have no idea what is going on, one of the reasons could be
> because it is spread out over several dozen email messages rather than
> a couple of focused documents.

Or 10 or so RFC's which even the Authors of cant ultimately say what is in
control at any given instant.

>
> > YES. In fact I ran a small survey and got a 97% YES response. 97%...
>
> I guess this is relatively meaningless without a context into the
> community from which the responses were received.

Actually it was done externally to this WG intentionally and it was stunning
to find out that no-one outside these key WG's has any idea as to what is
happening with the IETF or its processes.

>
> All the best,
> Rob


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to