Following up on that, I suggest a requirement that any DISCUSSes be posted to that mailing list, along with conversation/resolution of the DISCUSSes. I would very much like to see those last steps out in the open.
Only drawback to separate mailing list is that it requires active involvement to get hooked into the last call discussion... - Ralph On 1/15/07 2:37 PM, "Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:26:33 -0500 > John C Klensin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Perhaps we should make it a requirement that any document that >> is Last Called must be associated with a mailing list, perhaps >> one whose duration is limited to the Last Call period and any >> follow-ups until the document is either published or finally >> rejected. If there were a WG, then the WG list should be a >> proper subset of that list, anyone commenting during the Last >> Call should be added to it, and others could be added on request. >> > Actually, I think it's an excellent idea. Tracking Last Call comments > was always difficult, since the email tended to end up in several > different folders and wasn't archived elsewhere. > > > --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf