>> There is nearly exclusive concern about preventing all cases of >> problems, no matter how occasional or minor, with little apparent >> concern for the affirmative need to *faciliate* progress. >> > > True. If IP had been subject to the same level of scrutiny that is > applied to Identifier/locator separation proposals on the RAM list, we > would never have adopted IP (a protocol with so many security > holes)... > perhaps. but IP was designed in a more naive, and less hostile, time.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
