On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:24:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 66 lines which said:
> My "reading between the lines" interpretation of RFC 4693 Section 5 > is that perhaps creating IONs was considered easier than e.g. fixing > the procedures and tools for maintaining ordinary ietf.org web > pages. That's not my reading at all. This section explains clearly the problem with Web pages: Web pages, which can be changed without notice, provide very little ability to track changes, and have no formal standing -- confusion is often seen about who has the right to update them, what the process for updating them is, and so on. It is hard when looking at a Web page to see whether this is a current procedure, a procedure introduced and abandoned, or a draft of a future procedure. ... o Unlike Web pages, there is an explicit mechanism for finding "all current versions", and a mechanism for tracking the history of a document. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf