Le Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:02:49 ext Dan Wing, vous avez écrit : > > > Is this functionality already available in Vista and Leopard? > > > > I ignore whether the "privacy extension of stateless > > autoconfiguration" of RFC 4941 is supported.
It is supported in XP/Vista, and used by default for outgoing connections. It is supported by Linux, but outgoing connections default to the EUI64 address. Not sure about OSX. > > The "one new address per outgoing connection" rule, which I > > propose here for the fist time, would IMHO be worth implementing > > in addition to RFC 4941. > > > > But some more work to specify it in details would be needed > > before that. > > Some support of the idea would be a prerequisite. > > It would be interesting to write it down, and to see what > would break if the IP stack acquired and provided a fresh > v6 address to every new connection. Maybe nothing would > break, which would be great. Overkill. RFC 5014 already specifies an API to control privacy extensions. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
