Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > If this is true, he cannot post on IETF mailing lists and > should be banned of "Acknowledgments" sections as well!
The IESG Note in RFC 5242 is perfectly clear, with a length of 11 lines it reaches a third of the IESG Note size used in RFCs 4405, 4407, 4407, and 4408. For a shorter IESG Note I'd support an appeal or recall petition, but 11 lines ought to be good enough for everybody. It would be completely unjustfied to count empty lines, and then claim that 12 of 38 is less than a third, even if the 38 lines don't include a page header added by the RFC-editor without consent of the IESG, let alone any IETF Last Call. Frank _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
