I support adoption of these proposed guidelines, but have a couple of minor comments...
> After an erratum is reported, a report will be sent to the authors and > > Area Directors (ADs) of the WG in which it originated. If the WG has > closed or the document was not associated with a WG, then the > report will be sent to the ADs for the Area most closely associated > to the subject matter. If the document was produced by a WG that is not closed, the report should be copied to the WG chairs as well. > 5. Ugly typos that are clearly bogus typos but would not cause any > confusions to implementation or deployments should be Archived. The intent here is reasonable, but IMHO it's kind of poorly expressed. I'd suggest "Clear typographical errors which would not cause...". -- Jeff _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
