Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Seems good to me. Will the "archived" and "rejected" errata > be visible to the public? I think that should be mentioned.
Ideally the IESG procedure is integrated in the errata draft <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rfc-editor-errata-process> and published as RFC (it could be even a BCP). > BTW, "errata" is a plural noun. The singular is "erratum." But we rarely get away with the singular... ;-) Frank _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
