At 10:55 AM -0700 6/3/08, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
>***************************START OF TEXT********************************
>4.2 Recipients of the review
>
>The list of recipients of the review is tricky to get right. The main
>idea is to make sure all the relevant people receive the review. The
>recipient list is determined mainly by the following factors
>
>* The timeframe of the review (early vs. late)
>* The contents of the review (editorial vs. technical)
>
>Early reviews are usually performed by active participants of a working
>group.
Suresh,
Can you describe the difference between "early reviews
performed by active participants" and just "participation"? In my
mind, folks making suggestions and noting issues with a document during
the working group phase are WG contributors, not reviewers. How do
you see this?
Ted
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
