On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > request should be well established. I can think of at least two reasons > that are valid: > > * Exact duplicates > * Spam
As soon as you have evaluated the claim, even for "exact duplication" or "it's spam", haven't you done exactly what the pages claim not to do (take a position on the validity of the claim)? I know that sounds silly, but it seems to me that any evaluation _at all_ is automatically a contravention of what the pages say the IETF does. If the pages are just a list of claims, including bogus ones, then the IETF has taken no position at all. As soon as some of them have been evaluated, we're at the top of a slippery slope, I think. A -- Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
