+1 --On Tuesday, January 20, 2009 15:20 +0100 "Tom.Petch" <sisyp...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>... > Underlying this, I believe that if only the IPR WG had not had > to spend so much time discussing and re-discussing and > re-re-discussing ... this issue, then may be, just may be, we > would have had more time to focus on the transition > arrangements that we identified the need for in RFC5377 s.3. > In which case, this thread and all the other related ones > would never have occurred. > > So, in all seriousness, I do see this re-raising of this > issue, by you and others, as impeding our ability to solve the > problem that most needs solving, that of > moving forward to a world where our Contributions do contain > greater rights to allow derivative works. Which, ironically, > is a prerequisite for what you want. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
