Patrick,
Are you suggesting a new RR instead of the SRV or in addition to the SRV?
The latter seems useful; the former begs the question of how many SRV
variants we would want.
Joe
On 7/17/2010 12:33 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 17 jul 2010, at 21.27, Joe Touch wrote:
The appropriate solution for a port discovered via SRV records is to use TXT
records.
And, for the ones that have not followed the whole history of this last call,
my view is that a new RR type is needed, and I propose a URI resource record
that as RDATA have the full URI to the resource in question.
Patrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
