I also feel that 3:2:2 is about the right ratio. Ross
-----Original Message----- From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:28 PM To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: IETF Attendance by continent And even closer to 3:2:2 ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-i...@mit.edu> To: "Noel Chiappa" <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 5:14 PM Subject: Re: IETF Attendance by continent >>>>>> "Noel" == Noel Chiappa <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> writes: > > >> I suspect that a more nuanced analysis would have this as "1.7 and > >> shrinking : 1 and stable : 1 and stable". > > Noel> and his conclusion: > > >> I would support 2:1:1 for the present, with an intention to review > that > >> in 2-3 years. > > Noel> seems to me to be right on, given those 1.7:1:1 numbers - 1.7 is > closer to 2 > Noel> than it is to 1... > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
