I have reviewed the updated draft, and I believe it to be much clearer in intent and in which modifications to the underlying matching semantics are present. If it were to progress in its current form, I would not have any technical objections. While it is still somewhat confusing to have a URI comparison method defined but not used, it is at least clear what the method is and what is used instead in this.
On the general clarity, I also have to say that I believe that the document tipped over the "diff" line somewhere. That is, as a set of edits it is now sufficiently complex that it would almost certainly be better to apply the edits and re-spin the whole document rather than provide a set of textual diffs in the current format. If the ADs and WG chairs feel that there is no energy to tackle such a major editorial change, however, I certainly understand. It is possible to build up the correct state with the two documents; it is just more difficult. regards, Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
