On 4/6/11 10:45 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 06.04.2011 17:27, Russ Housley wrote: >> This revision proposes a solution to the issue raised by Brian >> Carpenter about documents lingering at Draft Standard. Some people >> thought it was a problem. Others thought it did not matter. The >> proposed solution leaves the matter in the hands of the IESG. >> >> Russ >> ... > > A question...: > >> A specification shall remain at the Proposed Standard maturity level >> for at least six (6) months before consideration for advancement to >> the Internet Standard maturity level. > > It would probably good to clarify when the six month period starts (IESG > approval? RFC publication?).
RFC publication seems sensible -- sometimes it can take more than six months between IESG approval and RFC publication! (Slow authors during AUTH48, dependencies on yet-to-be-published specs, etc.) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
