Mykyta: If this approach is acceptable to the community, implementation reports will no longer be needed at all.
Russ On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > 06.04.2011 18:27, Russ Housley wrote: >> This revision proposes a solution to the issue raised by Brian Carpenter >> about documents lingering at Draft Standard. Some people thought it was a >> problem. Others thought it did not matter. The proposed solution leaves >> the matter in the hands of the IESG. > I can hardly see my comments from 18 March > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65911.html) considered > in -05. Are you planning to make any changes regarding this in -06? > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev >> Russ >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool<idsubmiss...@ietf.org> >>> Date: April 6, 2011 11:22:25 AM EDT >>> To: hous...@vigilsec.com >>> Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net, ebur...@standardstrack.com >>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05 >>> >>> >>> A new version of I-D, draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05.txt has been >>> successfully submitted by Russ Housley and posted to the IETF repository. >>> >>> Filename: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels >>> Revision: 05 >>> Title: Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels >>> Creation_date: 2011-04-06 >>> WG ID: Independent Submission >>> Number_of_pages: 7 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document proposes several changes to the Internet Engineering >>> Task Force (IETF) Standards Process defined in RFC 2026, primarily a >>> reduction from three IETF standards track maturity levels to two. >>> >>> {{ RFC Editor: please change "proposes several changes to the" to >>> "changes the". }} >>> >>> >>> >>> The IETF Secretariat. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
