>I think he is saying that there is are _de facto_ criteria that are
>neither called out in 2026 nor in this draft, and that those criteria
>are the running code, so the documentation ought to be made to match.

This suggests that perhaps we should rename "Proposed Standard" to
"Not a Standard But Might Be One Later," promote the PS published
under the overstrict rules to DS, and we're done.

I'm not sure whether I'm serious or not.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to