> This suggests that perhaps we should rename "Proposed Standard" to > "Not a Standard But Might Be One Later," promote the PS published > under the overstrict rules to DS, and we're done. > > I'm not sure whether I'm serious or not.
Whether you are or not.., the only way to do this is to stop calling them "RFC"s. Maybe we should have a "PROP" series for PS docs, and only give them "RFC" numbers later, when they progress. Barry _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
