Comments inline........
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel Chiappa [mailto:j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 5:29 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org; v6...@ietf.org
Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
> From: Ronald Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>
> I think that I get it. There is no IETF consensus regarding the
> compromise proposed below. ...
> Right now, the only alternative that I see is to reintroduce
> draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic
But there is no rough consensus to do that either.
RB> That is the claim of an appeal on the table. Let's run the appeal process
RB> and figure out whether that claim is valid. We certainly aren't having any
RB> success reaching a decision on the mailing list.
RB>
RB> Ron
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
