After all, we moved RIPv1 to Historic when it was still widely
implemented, and used in many networks.
Yours,
Joel
On 7/19/2011 5:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/19/2011 14:01, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
Clearly, the view that making something historic when it's in active use is
offensive. No standards body could seek to stand behind their specifications,
or to give the impression of doing so, with such a position.
Define "active use."
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
