On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:36:10PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Scott Schmit wrote: > > > _http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 99 80 www.example.com. > > _http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 1 80 www-ds.example.com. > > www.example.com. A 198.0.2.1 > > www-ds.example.com. A 198.0.2.2 > > www-ds.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::2 > > > > I.e., content providers could control/measure their probability of > > failure. > > Are you saying content providers will actively control their probability > of failure from 99.99%> to 99% or 99.1% (assuming 10% IPv6 deployment) > only to promote IPv6?
I'm saying that they can be IPv6-ready without affecting their bottom line (at least, as they perceive it). Whether they will or not--as you point out--is another thing altogether, but at least it takes away an often-used excuse. Also, I've seen comments along the lines of "I want to phase in the IPv6 traffic" this allows that to happen. -- Scott Schmit _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
